A second strategist on every pursuit.
- BUILT FOR
- A national architecture and engineering firm.
- WHAT WE BUILT
- A thinking system from the engineering team's own work that reads an RFP, finds the strategic angle, and writes the draft PowerPoint response.
A system built on the firm's own knowledge.
We built an 11-step system from their past proposals and internal documents, with their thinking folded into each step. Beneath it all, we created a structured library, extracted from their past submissions.
All outputs trace back to work the firm has actually done, building its reasoning from these libraries. No made-up claims.
The system reads the RFP and turns every requirement into a clean matrix. It positions this matrix against a firm profile we created to recommend an approach. When approved by the team, it picks the projects, people and case studies that back it up. It writes the response in original language, shaped by the chosen approach and calling out response areas that require the firm's input. Finally, it checks its own work against the facts and against the RFP's requirements. The team steers and makes every call. The system does the groundwork and brings a second point of view.
The proof.
We ran the system on a pursuit the firm had already submitted, one we didn't use to build it, and compared its work to the team's. The system's proposal:
The case studies are the real test. The system only lands on the same three if everything before them is right: the read of the RFP, the measure of the firm against it and the strategic approach. It doesn't just think like AI. It thinks like the pursuit team.
Every system gets its own database and credentials, and your data is never used to train AI.
Ask for our security overview >Thinking about your first system? Let's talk it through.
Or email hello@thebigbadgood.com